And again and again the editor did not approve the correction, he returned the condition to the wrong one. (the non-existent phantom path reappeared, while the passage connecting the two roads was deleted)
It also does not help that in the discussion attached a picture of the actual situation in the field.
Dear editors, I’m really interested in what is your role?
Natalia Vignjevic • January 28, 2019 at 9:57 am UTC
this situation is resolved. The passage is connecting two roads now.
Thanks for the pictures!
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.